Claude Cowork Review: Anthropic’s AI Agent That Crashed the Software Market

Last Updated: February 2026

Claude Cowork turns your computer into a staffed office. Here’s our hands-on review of Anthropic’s autonomous work agent—and the Opus 4.6 model that powers it.


If you’ve been anywhere near the AI productivity space in the past few weeks, you’ve probably heard the noise. Anthropic didn’t just release another chatbot update—they shipped Claude Cowork, a fully autonomous AI work agent that can read your files, create spreadsheets, draft reports, browse the web, and manage multi-step projects while you focus on something else entirely.

Paired with the brand-new Claude Opus 4.6 model—which just set records on nearly every major benchmark—Cowork represents the most ambitious attempt yet to turn an AI model into an actual coworker. Not a chat window. Not a suggestion engine. A coworker.

We’ve been testing Cowork since its research preview dropped in January 2026. In this Claude Cowork review, we’ll break down exactly what it does, how it compares to ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, what it costs, and whether it’s actually worth the hype.

Spoiler: it mostly is.


What Is Claude Cowork?

Claude Cowork is a new feature inside Anthropic’s Claude desktop app (macOS, with Windows coming soon) that gives Claude autonomous access to a folder on your computer. Think of it as upgrading from texting an assistant to actually giving them a desk in your office.

In a normal Claude conversation, you copy-paste text, upload files, and wait for responses. In Cowork, you point Claude at a folder and say something like “organize these expense receipts into a spreadsheet” or “draft a quarterly report from my notes.” Claude then:

  1. Makes a plan for how to complete the task
  2. Reads, creates, and edits files in your designated folder
  3. Works autonomously through the steps, checking in with you along the way
  4. Asks permission before taking significant or potentially destructive actions

The experience is fundamentally different from a chat. You queue up tasks, Claude works through them—sometimes in parallel—and you check the results when you’re ready. Anthropic describes it as “leaving messages for a coworker,” and that’s honestly the most accurate framing we’ve seen for any AI productivity tool.

Built on Claude Code’s Foundation

Here’s what makes Cowork interesting from a technical standpoint: it’s built on the same agentic framework as Claude Code, Anthropic’s developer-focused coding agent. Claude Code has been quietly dominating the agentic coding space—developers started using it for everything from debugging to writing documentation to managing entire codebases.

Anthropic noticed that people were using Claude Code for non-coding tasks too, and Cowork was born. It takes that same agentic architecture—planning, tool use, file access, iterative execution—and wraps it in a more approachable interface for knowledge workers who don’t write code.


Claude Opus 4.6: The Brain Behind Cowork

You can’t talk about Cowork without talking about the model powering it. Claude Opus 4.6, released on February 5, 2026, is Anthropic’s most intelligent model to date, and the benchmarks aren’t even close.

Key Opus 4.6 Specs

  • Context window: 1 million tokens (beta)—a first for Opus-class models
  • API pricing: $5 per million input tokens / $25 per million output tokens
  • Benchmark highlights:
  • #1 on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (agentic coding)
  • #1 on Humanity’s Last Exam (multidisciplinary reasoning)
  • #1 on BrowseComp (hard-to-find online information retrieval)
  • #1 on GDPval-AA (economically valuable knowledge work)—beating GPT-5.2 by ~144 Elo points
  • 90.2% on BigLaw Bench (legal reasoning)
  • 76% on MRCR v2 8-needle 1M (long-context retrieval) vs. 18.5% for Sonnet 4.5

What the Benchmarks Actually Mean

Numbers are nice. Here’s what matters in practice:

Long-context performance is transformative. The “context rot” problem—where AI models lose the plot as conversations get longer—has been a persistent frustration. Opus 4.6 scores 76% on the toughest needle-in-a-haystack tests where its predecessor scored under 20%. In real use, this means you can hand it a 500-page document set and it will actually find and reason about the details buried on page 347.

Agentic planning is genuinely better. Early Access partners reported that Opus 4.6 “breaks complex tasks into independent subtasks, runs tools and subagents in parallel, and identifies blockers with real precision.” One company had it autonomously close 13 GitHub issues and assign 12 more to the right team members in a single day across 6 repositories.

It knows when to think harder. Opus 4.6 features “adaptive thinking”—it can sense when a problem needs deep reasoning and when it doesn’t, allocating its compute budget accordingly. You can also manually control this with effort settings (high, medium, low).


Key Features of Claude Cowork

1. Autonomous File Management

Point Cowork at any folder and it can read, create, edit, rename, and organize files. We tested it on a Downloads folder with 200+ unsorted files—PDFs, screenshots, spreadsheets, random docs. In about four minutes, Claude had categorized everything into labeled subfolders, renamed files with descriptive names, and generated a summary index.

2. Document Creation and Editing

Cowork doesn’t just chat about documents—it creates them. Need a slide deck from your meeting notes? A formatted report from raw data? A project proposal from a Slack thread? Cowork writes directly to your file system in the formats you need. Anthropic has added dedicated “skills” for creating documents, presentations, and spreadsheets.

3. Multi-Task Parallel Execution

This is the killer feature. You can queue up multiple tasks and Cowork handles them in parallel. Ask it to “research competitors, organize my expense folder, and draft next week’s team update” and it works on all three simultaneously. You can add new tasks while it’s running without interrupting existing work.

4. Connector Integration

Cowork plugs into Claude’s existing connector ecosystem. If you’ve connected Slack, Google Workspace, or other services to Claude, Cowork can pull context from those sources while working. Combined with Claude in Chrome (browser extension), Cowork can also handle tasks that require web access.

5. Enterprise Search (Team/Enterprise Plans)

For business users, Cowork integrates with enterprise search across your organization. Connect Microsoft 365, Slack, and other platforms, and Claude can search across your company’s knowledge base while executing tasks.

6. Safety Controls

Anthropic clearly thought about the “giving an AI agent access to your files” concern. Cowork includes:

  • Folder-level permissions: Claude can only access folders you explicitly grant
  • Action confirmation: Claude asks before taking significant actions (especially deletions)
  • Prompt injection defenses: Built-in protections against malicious content in files or web pages trying to hijack Claude’s behavior
  • Full audit trail: You can see everything Claude did and why

Pricing: What Does Claude Cowork Cost?

Here’s the pricing breakdown as of February 2026. Cowork’s availability varies by plan:

Plan Monthly Price Cowork Access Usage Level Key Features
Free $0 ❌ No Basic Web chat, basic features
Pro $20/mo ($17/mo annual) ❌ No (waitlist) Standard Claude Code, Projects, Research, MCP connectors, Memory
Max From $100/mo ✅ Yes 5x or 20x Pro usage Early access features, priority access
Team $25/seat/mo ($20 annual) ✅ Yes Team-level Enterprise search, SSO, admin controls, Claude Code included
Enterprise Custom ✅ Yes Custom Enhanced context window, HIPAA-ready, audit logs, SCIM

Important notes:

  • Cowork originally launched for Max subscribers only (December 2025), then expanded to Pro subscribers on January 16, 2026, and Team/Enterprise plans on January 23, 2026
  • Pro users are on a waitlist—Max and Team/Enterprise have full access now
  • Currently macOS only; Windows support is planned
  • Usage limits apply—heavier Cowork tasks consume more of your plan’s allocation

API Pricing for Developers

If you’re building with the Opus 4.6 model directly:

Model Input (≤200K) Input (>200K) Output (≤200K) Output (>200K)
Opus 4.6 $5/MTok $10/MTok $25/MTok $37.50/MTok
Sonnet 4.5 $3/MTok $6/MTok $15/MTok $22.50/MTok
Haiku 4.5 $1/MTok $5/MTok

Notably, Opus 4.6 maintains the same pricing as its predecessor Opus 4.5, despite the significant capability improvements. Batch processing gets a 50% discount.


Claude Cowork vs ChatGPT vs Microsoft Copilot: Head-to-Head Comparison

The AI work assistant market is now a three-horse race. Here’s how the top contenders compare:

Feature Claude Cowork ChatGPT (GPT-5.2) Microsoft Copilot
Autonomous Agent Mode ✅ Full autonomous execution ✅ GPTs + custom agents ⚠️ Limited to Office suite
Local File Access ✅ Direct folder access ❌ Upload only ⚠️ Via OneDrive/SharePoint
Multi-Task Parallel ✅ Queue multiple tasks ❌ Sequential only ❌ Single-task
Context Window 1M tokens (beta) 128K tokens 128K tokens
Code Execution ✅ Via Claude Code integration ✅ Code Interpreter ⚠️ Limited
Office Integration Excel + PowerPoint (preview) Limited ✅ Full Office 365 suite
Browser Integration ✅ Claude in Chrome ✅ Built-in browsing ✅ Edge integration
Enterprise Search ✅ Multi-platform ✅ Enterprise tier ✅ Microsoft Graph
Agentic Coding ✅ Best-in-class (Terminal-Bench #1) ✅ Strong ⚠️ GitHub Copilot separate
Safety/Alignment ✅ Industry-leading (system card) ✅ Strong ✅ Strong
Starting Price $100/mo (Max) $20/mo (Plus) $30/user/mo (M365 Copilot)
Platform macOS (Windows coming) Web, iOS, Android, Desktop Windows, Web, Mobile

The Verdict on Each

Choose Claude Cowork if: You want the most capable autonomous agent, need to handle complex multi-step work tasks, value long-context performance, or do serious coding work. The 1M token context window and agentic planning are unmatched.

Choose ChatGPT if: You want the widest platform availability, a massive plugin/GPT ecosystem, or you need broad general-purpose AI at a lower entry price. GPT-5.2 is a strong model, but Opus 4.6 outperforms it on most knowledge-work benchmarks.

Choose Microsoft Copilot if: Your organization is deeply invested in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and you want AI embedded directly in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams. It’s less autonomous but more tightly integrated with the tools you already use.


Real-World Use Cases: Where Cowork Shines

After weeks of testing, here are the scenarios where Claude Cowork genuinely delivers:

Financial Analysis

Feed Cowork a folder of financial statements, earnings reports, or expense records. It will organize the data, create analysis spreadsheets, identify trends, and generate summary reports. Anthropic specifically highlighted finance as a strength, and GDPval-AA results back this up—Opus 4.6 beats every other model on economically valuable knowledge work.

Research and Report Writing

This is Cowork’s sweet spot. Give it a pile of source documents—PDFs, notes, web articles—and ask for a structured report. It reads everything, extracts key information, and writes coherent long-form content. The 1M token context window means it can ingest enormous source sets without losing detail.

Project Organization

Messy folders, scattered notes, disorganized file structures—Cowork handles all of it. We pointed it at a chaotic project folder with 6 months of accumulated files and it reorganized everything into a logical structure in minutes, complete with a README explaining the organization scheme.

Code Review and Debugging

With Claude Code integration, Cowork bridges the gap between business tasks and technical work. It can review pull requests, identify bugs, suggest fixes, and even execute code changes. In cybersecurity evaluations, Opus 4.6 produced better results than all competitors in 38 out of 40 blind investigations.

Legal Document Analysis

With a 90.2% score on BigLaw Bench, Opus 4.6 is remarkably capable at legal reasoning. Cowork can analyze contracts, identify risks, compare terms across documents, and generate summaries—all autonomously from your file system.


What Could Be Better

No review is complete without the downsides. Here’s where Cowork falls short:

1. macOS Only (For Now)

This is the biggest limitation. If you’re on Windows or Linux, you’re locked out entirely. Anthropic says Windows support is coming, but there’s no firm timeline. For a tool aimed at knowledge workers—many of whom use Windows in corporate environments—this is a significant gap.

2. Price Barrier

At $100/month minimum for Max (the cheapest plan with guaranteed Cowork access), this isn’t an impulse purchase. Pro users ($20/month) are on a waitlist. Compare this to ChatGPT Plus at $20/month or even Microsoft Copilot at $30/user/month, and the cost difference is substantial. You need to be getting serious value from the autonomous agent features to justify it.

3. Occasional Overthinking

Opus 4.6 sometimes spends more time reasoning through a simple task than necessary. Anthropic acknowledges this and recommends adjusting the effort parameter, but it adds friction. A task that should take 30 seconds occasionally takes 2 minutes because the model decided to think deeply about your file naming conventions.

4. Research Preview Caveats

Cowork is explicitly labeled a “research preview.” That means bugs, rough edges, and features that might change. We encountered occasional file access hiccups and a few instances where Claude’s plan didn’t match what it actually executed. Nothing catastrophic, but you wouldn’t hand it production-critical work unsupervised just yet.

5. Prompt Injection Risk

To their credit, Anthropic is transparent about this. When Claude processes files from untrusted sources or browses the web, there’s a risk that malicious content could influence its behavior. Anthropic has built defenses, but they acknowledge that “agent safety is still an active area of development.” Worth keeping in mind if you’re processing files from external sources.


New Features Launched Alongside Cowork

The Opus 4.6 release came with several other updates worth knowing about:

Agent Teams (Claude Code)

Developers can now assemble teams of Claude agents that work on tasks together—a coordinator delegates subtasks to specialized sub-agents. This is the enterprise version of Cowork’s multi-task capabilities.

Compaction (API)

Claude can now summarize its own context to keep working on longer-running tasks without hitting token limits. This is a subtle but important feature for building production agents.

Adaptive Thinking

Instead of a binary on/off toggle for extended thinking, Opus 4.6 can pick up contextual clues about how much reasoning a problem needs. Developers also get manual effort controls (high/medium/low) for fine-tuning.

Claude in Excel (Upgraded) and PowerPoint (New)

Claude now works inside Microsoft Excel with substantially improved capabilities, and a new PowerPoint integration is available in research preview. This narrows the gap with Microsoft Copilot’s native Office integration.


Who Is Claude Cowork Best For?

Based on our testing, here’s who gets the most value:

  • Knowledge workers drowning in documents, reports, and unstructured data
  • Developers and technical leads who need both coding and business task automation
  • Researchers working with large document sets who need synthesis and analysis
  • Small teams that want an AI teammate without enterprise-scale budgets (Team plan at $25/seat)
  • Power users who already use Claude and want to unlock its full autonomous potential
  • Financial analysts who need AI that can reason about complex economic data

And who should probably wait:

  • Windows users (until Windows support launches)
  • Casual users who are happy with basic AI chat ($100/month is steep for light use)
  • Enterprises with strict compliance needs (research preview = not production-hardened yet)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Claude Cowork and how does it differ from regular Claude?

Claude Cowork is an autonomous agent mode within the Claude desktop app that gives Claude direct access to folders on your computer. Unlike regular Claude conversations where you manually copy-paste content and receive text responses, Cowork can independently read, create, edit, and organize files on your machine. It plans tasks, executes them step-by-step, and works on multiple tasks in parallel—more like delegating to a coworker than chatting with a bot.

Is Claude Cowork available on Windows?

Not yet. As of February 2026, Claude Cowork is available exclusively on macOS through the Claude desktop app. Anthropic has confirmed that Windows support is planned but hasn’t announced a specific launch date. If you’re on Windows, you can join the waitlist to be notified when it becomes available.

How much does Claude Cowork cost?

Claude Cowork requires at minimum a Claude Max plan at $100/month. Pro plan subscribers ($20/month) can join a waitlist for access. Team plans ($25/seat/month) and Enterprise plans (custom pricing) include Cowork access. There’s no way to access Cowork on the free tier.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than GPT-5.2?

On most benchmarks, yes. Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms GPT-5.2 on GDPval-AA (knowledge work) by approximately 144 Elo points, leads on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (agentic coding), Humanity’s Last Exam (reasoning), and BrowseComp (information retrieval). Opus 4.6 also features a 1M token context window versus GPT-5.2’s 128K. However, GPT-5.2 remains competitive in certain areas and has broader platform availability. The “best” model depends on your specific use case.

Is Claude Cowork safe to use with sensitive files?

Anthropic has implemented several safety measures including folder-level permissions (Claude only accesses folders you grant), action confirmation prompts before destructive operations, prompt injection defenses, and comprehensive audit trails. However, Cowork is still in research preview, and Anthropic acknowledges that agent safety is an evolving field. We’d recommend starting with non-sensitive files to get comfortable with how it works before trusting it with critical data.


Final Verdict: Should You Get Claude Cowork?

Rating: 8.5/10

Claude Cowork is the most impressive AI work agent we’ve tested. The combination of Opus 4.6’s benchmark-crushing intelligence with Cowork’s autonomous file access and multi-task execution creates something that genuinely feels like having an AI teammate rather than an AI chatbox.

The 1M token context window alone changes what’s possible—you can hand Claude a quarter-million words of source material and it actually retains the details. The agentic planning is best-in-class. The safety architecture is thoughtfully designed. And the pricing, while steep for individuals, is competitive for teams getting real productivity gains.

The caveats are real: macOS-only limits the audience, the $100/month minimum is a barrier, and “research preview” means rough edges. But for knowledge workers, developers, researchers, and teams who deal with complex, multi-step work every day, Cowork isn’t just worth watching—it’s worth using right now.

Anthropic set out to build an AI that works alongside you, not just for you. With Cowork and Opus 4.6, they’re closer to that vision than anyone else in the industry.

What we love:

  • Autonomous file management that actually works
  • 1M token context window (industry-leading)
  • Multi-task parallel execution
  • Best-in-class agentic planning and reasoning
  • Thoughtful safety controls
  • Same API pricing as predecessor despite massive improvements

What needs work:

  • macOS only (Windows coming)
  • $100/month minimum for guaranteed access
  • Occasional overthinking on simple tasks
  • Research preview = expect some bugs
  • Prompt injection risk with untrusted content

Interested in exploring more AI tools? Check out our AI Tools Pricing Comparison 2026 for a complete breakdown of every major platform, or read our guide on the best AI coding tools to see how Claude Code stacks up against the competition.


CT

ComputerTech Editorial Team

Our team tests every AI tool hands-on before reviewing it. With 126+ tools evaluated across 8 categories, we focus on real-world performance, honest pricing analysis, and practical recommendations. Learn more about our review process →